This isn’t to express the pro-marriage motion did not exploit the Massachusetts Supreme Court choice in addition to effect it provoked among anti-gay voters and social conservatives resentful of this alleged “liberal elite.” Concentrating on marriage-minded gays and lesbians as well as the “activist judges” who have been “legislating through the bench,” conservatives discovered a simple proxy for the decline in wedding. The “threat” of gay wedding enabled them to portray households that are marital under attack (from homosexuals and judges) without addressing some of the economic facets that place marital households under anxiety and without straight attacking some of the related legal and social transformations (no-fault divorce proceedings, new reproductive technologies, ladies in the workplace) that most Americans will be reluctant to reject. (mais…)